I also included my CARE Model planning tool 8.1 below it.
Please comment on my action plan; any advice would be most appreciated.
(Scrolled down to fit it correctly on webpage.)
Identify Concerns that must change (look to
the future) (Tool 8.1 CARE
Model: Planning Tool)
1. Meeting our
reading/math/science AYP on the Iowa Assessments
2. Decreasing
the number of referrals and tardies, which can lead to detentions that are not
served, and again a higher suspension rate.
3. Decreasing
the rate of suspension and expulsions at L&M Jr./Sr. High School
Identify Affirmations that must be sustained
(look to the present)
1. The
implementation of PBIS, including: common area; classroom; bathroom; and
lunchroom     
     expectations.
2. Positive
feedback to students who are being respectful; acting responsibly; and influencing
    others to do the
same. This can manifest in many behaviors and ways in the school from: being on
time every time to class, and in turning in assignments completed.  
3. Positive
relations between students and parents and teachers.  These positive relations cab ne affirmed by: emails and
postcards home expressing positive student behaviors, planned events and
meetings that allow positive interactions with teachers, and supporting staff, rewards
and honors for good behaviors; etc. 
SMART Recommendations that must be
implemented: (Specific,
Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely)
1. Have teachers
produce career development plan, related to district goals in reaching AYP for
math/reading/science/technology. 
Have a pre-assessment developed for beginning of school year, and
post-assessment at the end of the school year, for the next school year.
2. Continue to
reinforce the expectations for common areas, lunchroom, bathrooms, and
classrooms. 
3. Brainstorm
methods to deal with detentions not-served from 3 or more tardies in one week,
to decrease the in-school suspension rate, which is included in the state
suspension/expulsion data. 
Implement methods.
4. Brainstorm
and implement methods to increase parent/teacher/student involvement in school
community for next school year. 
EVALUATE – Specifically and Often: (Identify the best ways to evaluate the
implemented recommendations.)
1. Have PLC’s monitor
data from career professional data from Pre-assessments & Post-assessments,
related to district and school goals.
2. Parent,
teacher, student survey and school data from IS3 surveys and Power School.
3. Using data
from IS3 surveys, produce more detail specific surveys from students, parents,
teachers, that pin-point specific behaviors and events that are representative
of the data from IS3 surveys, in order to correctly assess current status of
implementation of PBIS, to evaluate correctly.
4. Group discussions
by PBIS community and in PD community with faculty and staff.
| 
OUTCOMES  | 
ACTIVITIES  | 
RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS
  NEEDED  | 
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES  | 
TIME LINE  | 
Benchmarks/  
ASSESSMENT  | 
Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and
  assessments  | 
| 
To assess the implementation of the PBIS program in
  the Jr./Sr. High School 
To assess how the implementation of the PBIS program
  in the Jr./Sr. High School 
is related to the Iowa Assessment Scores  | 
To gather data on how the current implementation of
  PBIS has affected: 
1)    
  office
  referral rates 
2)    
  tardy
  rates 
3)    
  suspension/expulsion
  rates 
4)    
  attendance
  rates 
Compare the PBIS data to the  
Iowa
  Assessment data from date of origin of PBIS | 
Data from Power School for: 
# of office referrals issued since 2009-10 school
  year-Present 
# of tardies issued,  since 2009-10 school year-Present 
Suspension and expulsion data from the IS3 index 
Attendance records reported on School Improvement
  Plan from 2009-Present school year 
Iowa Assessment data 
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan | 
Site supervisor High School Principal 
PBIS committee members 
Myself  
Curriculum Director | 
April 2013-May 2014 | 
IS3 index data for safe and supportive schools in
  Iowa  
Student, Teacher, Parent survey data 
Iowa Assessment proficiency levels in regards to the
  Comprehensive School Improvement Plan 
and the  implementation of PBIS 
Student specific interviews based on responses in
  the IS3 index surveys 
Comprehensive | 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment